Upcoming movie news links

General Discussions, Polls, Lists, Video Clips and Links
Post Reply
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » January 15th, 2008, 7:09 am

Will be seeing it on Friday, if everything works out alright! I'm really looking forward to it. :D

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » January 17th, 2008, 4:35 pm

You're so lucky!! Let us know how it is.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » January 19th, 2008, 12:08 pm

Saw it last night...Very entertaining, I really enjoyed it. However, not everyone who sees it is going to love it - I think a lot of people will actually come out of the theater hating it, so expect some mixed reactions!

Some points I'd like to make...

The hand-held camera feel worked well, I think. Some people complained of motion sickness but I got used to it after a few minutes. Maybe it depends on how used to that kind of thing you are - those who play a lot of video games or watch online videos might have an easier time with it than people who are more used to smooth, swooping camera moves of regular films.

[This one is concerning the monster, though I'm going to avoid being too specific and giving anything away]
I think the monster was pretty good overall, not *amazing*, but fitting to the movie. Actually, I kind of wished it had more of an aquatic-inspired design, seeing as the viral marketing campaign HEAVILY hinted at it coming from the ocean. I'm also not sure if they should have shown it so early (or at all), since it's much easier to be frightened of something when you have no idea what it is.
Also, I read a tip online to stay through the credits, as did a bunch of other people in the theater. While there is a lovely overture by Micheal Giacchino in there, everyone who stayed after was a bit miffed when nothing else happened. :P

Lastly, there's a Star Trek teaser trailer in front of it as well, which was a nice surprise.

UPDATE: Yeah, I'm reading more and more reports that there's something after the credits...Was it part of th credits, something you had to read? Only thing I saw that was amusing was the credit given to Nick for using SpongeBob clips...Did I miss it? :(
Last edited by Meg on January 19th, 2008, 12:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » January 19th, 2008, 12:29 pm

Oh, and apparently, our very own Droosan had a hand in this! Way to go, man! :D

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » January 19th, 2008, 2:21 pm

You actually spotted his name? Very cool. Congrats, Droo! :)

Thanks for the recap Meg, sounds good. Might go see it soon... But that does sound amusing, SpongeBob clips! ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1960
Joined: December 16th, 2004
Location: Burbank, Calif.

Post by droosan » January 19th, 2008, 3:04 pm

Yes, I did a tiny amount of work on Cloverfield last summer .. basically, I just built simple geometry which the pre-viz artists at Third Floor used to block-out the Brooklyn Bridge and Subway Tunnel sequences. None of my actual model work appears in the finished film; it was strictly in 'animatics', which were then used as reference by the final FX teams.

It was a fun job .. but my part of it only lasted a couple of weeks, and then I was on to something else. To be honest, I did so little, that I wasn't really expecting a credit on the film (I've done far more work on certain other films, in which I went uncredited) .. but I'd found out through a friend who saw an 'advance' screening that I was indeed in there. :)
Last edited by droosan on January 19th, 2008, 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » January 19th, 2008, 3:17 pm

Actually, I read the Cloverfield thread on Animation Nation. ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1960
Joined: December 16th, 2004
Location: Burbank, Calif.

Post by droosan » January 19th, 2008, 3:19 pm

I'd just figured-out that's where you'd found out .. :lol:

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » January 20th, 2008, 4:59 pm

:)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » January 22nd, 2008, 8:24 pm

Cheater! ;)

Fyi, Cloverfield comes out on DVD and HD-DVD in April. No further details available. Wth it being so soon, I'll just wait to rent it.

AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 3197
Joined: October 22nd, 2004

Post by Josh » January 23rd, 2008, 10:02 am

Meg wrote:UPDATE: Yeah, I'm reading more and more reports that there's something after the credits...Was it part of th credits, something you had to read? Only thing I saw that was amusing was the credit given to Nick for using SpongeBob clips...Did I miss it? :(
At the end of the credits, the sound of static plays. But...
When played backward, the sound is actually someone - probably Rob - saying what sounds like, 'It's still alive.'
1-18-08 Project Cloverfield has the noted sound, for those who didn't catch it in theaters.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » January 23rd, 2008, 1:01 pm

Josh wrote:
When played backward, the sound is actually someone - probably Rob - saying what sounds like, 'It's still alive.'
Although I don't see how he could possibly survive that stuff at the end, I sure hope it's him - he's kind of a cutie. :P

Also, if you stay on the 1-81-08 site long enough, you can here the monster roar. It's pretty neat.

AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6708
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey » February 1st, 2008, 3:50 pm

And speaking of "Cloverfield"...

http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=41512
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 3845
Joined: May 31st, 2005
Location: Maryland

Post by Meg » February 1st, 2008, 5:14 pm

Might be good...Hopefully it won't recycle the gimmicks from the first though! :) Those might not be as enjoyable the second time 'round.

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25714
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » February 2nd, 2008, 12:30 pm

I've yet to see the first (probably Monday) but a second sounds like a movie too far.

The monster in the city has been done to death and the only thing Cloverfield brought to things was the gimmicky camera shake.

Basically, what's the point, apart from money, in simply repeating the trick? As with the Blair Witches, I hope it bombs, personally.

Post Reply