Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9095
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Post
by ShyViolet » August 1st, 2007, 5:04 pm
Old Shrek 1 trailer. I know it's been a while, but it reminded me of how much I loved the first one.
Click
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » October 7th, 2007, 11:15 pm
Just in case nobody knew,
Shrek The Third is coming out on DVD November 13th and here's the cover art:
I think its awful.
The red curtain is kind of annoying, it looks too busy (Pinochio and Prince Charming should've been left out) and one of the babies head is cut off, so it could appear on the spine.
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9095
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Post
by ShyViolet » October 8th, 2007, 1:39 am
Hate it too.
Shrek was NOT meant to be seen with red....(unless it's a Christmas thing...j/k
)
I still love Merlin and the babies, though.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
-
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25724
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » October 8th, 2007, 9:51 am
And it is not "the best Shrek yet".
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » October 9th, 2007, 12:15 pm
Bah,ugly cover,i think they should make it purple (like the marchandise),and too bad there's no Sleeping Beauty (she was my favorite character) and they made Pinocchio and Prince Charming insted
.
But i still think it is the best Shrek (okay,maybe it's Shrek 2 but it's better then the first).
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Team
- Posts: 6710
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Post
by Dacey » October 11th, 2007, 8:35 pm
Notice how they don't have Arthur on it.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » October 12th, 2007, 6:22 am
Wendy's Jane wrote:Notice how they don't have Arthur on it.
Yeah,now i noticed,they either don't Arthur or the Dronkeys!
.
Such a bad cover.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 42
- Joined: October 12th, 2007
Post
by CharlieBarkin » October 12th, 2007, 7:22 am
They should have finished it with Shrek 2. This proves that Dreamworks essentially is only interested in the profits, as from what I've heard Shrek the Third is neither funny or entertaining, a shame given how good the first 2 films were. And if the rumours of a further 2 films in the Shrek franchise are true, you can almost guarantee that the quality will leave MUCH to be desired.
-
- AV Team
- Posts: 6710
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Post
by Dacey » October 12th, 2007, 12:47 pm
Once Upon A Dream wrote:Wendy's Jane wrote:Notice how they don't have Arthur on it.
Yeah,now i noticed,they either don't Arthur or the Dronkeys!
.
Such a bad cover.
I wasn't actually complaining when I said that.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » October 12th, 2007, 1:31 pm
Still,Artie,the Dronkeys and Sleeping Beauty are more important then Pinnochio.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9095
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Post
by ShyViolet » October 12th, 2007, 4:20 pm
Notice how they don't have Arthur on it. Wink
How could they do that?
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » October 12th, 2007, 4:42 pm
They also don't have Dronkeys and Sleeping Beauty!
.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » October 12th, 2007, 5:12 pm
Yeah, you said that already...
I'm happy Arthur's not on the cover either.
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 823
- Joined: February 22nd, 2007
- Location: Belgium
Post
by Jeroen » October 13th, 2007, 8:19 am
Artie's popularity aside, he should have been on the cover, he was a central character in the film after all.
-
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25724
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » October 13th, 2007, 8:39 am
He <I>was</I> the central plot point!
They need more on the cover to not make this look like the first or 2, too. The posters for The Third could have been for any Shrek film.
Blah...