DreamWorks' SHREK

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9067
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » June 8th, 2007, 7:55 pm

I really just wish they'd stop here. Shrek 3 was great and all, but enough is enough. :?


I don't buy into "there are other chapters in his story." They've told his story. Two is OK, three is pushing it. Four and five is just too much. :(


I feel bad saying this, :( and I will always love DW. I'm sure the films will be "good"--I've never NOT enjoyed a DW film, even the ones I didn't think were all that great. But Shrek 1 was so great, and adding this other stuff will just dilute that.


(I am, however, looking forward to Puss 'n Boots. I love Puss, and this film will rock. :) ) But MORE Shrek after that....I have my doubts. :?



However, Bee Movie, Monsters vs. Aliens, Mad 2 and Kung Fu Panda all look just awesome....
:D
Last edited by ShyViolet on June 9th, 2007, 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » June 8th, 2007, 10:58 pm

Its funny, I feel the complete opposite, yet I don't love DW as much as you.

Heh.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9067
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » June 9th, 2007, 1:19 am

But I know you really like sequels Dan, so....:)


Maybe I'll come around to it eventually....as long as Shrek's story does eventually END. :?




Also, there's a casting call now for the Shrek Broadway Show!!! :lol:



http://iwanttobeshrek.com/



Seriously. Has to be read to be believed. :wink:
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » June 10th, 2007, 12:50 am

True, and no matter what I say, I think we'll end up in circles. Still funny, though. :P

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25561
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » June 10th, 2007, 8:16 am

They really should make this a TV series, like the Grease show.

"Who Wants To Be Shrek?" - Saturday nights on ABC. ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9067
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » June 10th, 2007, 3:08 pm

And then splice it with "American Ideal" meets "Who wants to be Shrek" :?


I hope I don't live to see THAT....:(


I also really hope DW gets out from under Paramount/Nick.

Shrek as family-safe/family fun/nice guy/healthy food/family values is SO not working for me....:? :roll:
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » June 10th, 2007, 6:49 pm

American Ideal? Never heard of it. ;)

I would like a TV series of sorts for Shrek. Depending on what its about, of course. But unfortunately, that will never happen. (And watch, they announce it! :lol:)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 248
Joined: August 23rd, 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by bawpcwpn » June 11th, 2007, 12:46 am

Could you do a TV series for Shrek? What is there really to look at? It worked with Lilo and Stitch because of all the other aliens to roundup, and it worked with Buzz Lightyear because of all his adventures. What would they do with Shrek?
"But I'm your No. 1 Fan!"
- Buddy a.k.a Syndrome

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » June 11th, 2007, 2:48 am

Maybe....

Shrek lives near all those fairy tale creatures, right? Well, every episode he could interact with someone new. Like one episode could deal with him, Donkey, and Puss meeting the old woman who lived in a shoe. A twist could be that she hates having to care for so many kids, so Shrek offers to take care of them, provided she babysits his kids. You know what happens next, she has a miserable time, and is beyond anxious to return to her own family.

Doesn't that sound great?


Ok, maybe not. :roll: ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 823
Joined: February 22nd, 2007
Location: Belgium

Post by Jeroen » June 11th, 2007, 1:06 pm

Well, a TV series of Shrek would be lame in my opinion

1. They can't afford to make the episodes look as good as the movies.

2. Because its a bad idea

3. You can only milk a cashcow that much....

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 178
Joined: August 9th, 2005

Post by Zach » June 11th, 2007, 1:16 pm

Jeroen has 3 good points.
There really isn't many ideas for a Shrek series.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9067
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » June 13th, 2007, 8:36 pm

Hey Ben, make sure to say how you feel about Shrek the Third when you see it! :) (I liked James' review, just wondered what you thought is all. Or, what you will think.)


:wink:
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25561
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » June 14th, 2007, 6:49 am

Surely! :)

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25561
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » June 24th, 2007, 9:34 am

Comments have been asked for, and comments ye shall get. I was lucky enough to catch Shrek ahead of its UK opening thanks to my friends at the local theater where I am running my Film Festival this week. He got the print in from Paramount with Raiders, which we are showing, and he wanted to run it before the first public screening, so I sat in on Thursday night.

Hmmm...

Afraid I didn't like it. It wasn't badly made, but nothing happened!

Mike Myers wasn't Shrek for the first half...he was doing an impression of Shrek. The story, which promised Shrek getting to grips with being King and having to deal with babies, didn't do that at all. He was off on the same kind of road movie journey as the first film and, baby nightmare aside, they didn't come into it until five minutes at the end.

The babies themselves freaked me out. I already thought this, but seeing them move I couldn't get this image out of my head:
http://www.olgabaclanova.com/picture_ga ... eaks_6.jpg

Check out the kid in the middle hugging the man and the two sitting next to him on the steps, from Tod Bowning's Freaks...was this an in-joke of some kind, or just a sick-joke?

Donkey and Puss swapping voices/bodies...why?

Eric Idle getting upset at a gag that was NOTHING like the Monty Python joke, which itself only borrows from years and years of radio plays where coconuts were used to convey galloping hooves. Lame, Eric...I hope he loses any court action and has cut off his DreamWorks ties...the guy is majorly up his own behind.

The villains were awful...no reason for Charming to get them all together...would have been MUCH better if Shrek had really had to deal with being a king and they'd drafted in Charming to give him lessons in manners, only for him to sabotage the efforts.

There was no story. Period.

Bright spot: Gingerbread Man's life flashing before his eyes - genius. Some of the one liners. But not much and nowhere near the repeatability of Shrek 2.

The Princesses going hard core at the end? Where were the jokes? Where was the danger of Fiona being pregnant and having to protect the baby? Why didn't Lilian head butt them out of the jail immediately? Where did THAT come from?

Shrek turning up at the end and, um, making a speech for the film's climax? Drab. This film had no spirit.

I liked Timberlake...he wasn't bad, and the college sequence was pretty fun, bu there wasn't anything special in the whole film. I'd like to see it again on DVD to see if it works for a second time, but I didn't "enjoy it".

Some of the animation was, frankly, not on par, especially the horse cycles, which were SO GOOD in the second one. Characters were stiff here and anyone getting up to go into a move were not keyframed correctly and they just bounded into action without much thought.

They say they always had four...no five...films planned. Baloney! This one wasn't dreamed up as part of an overall series...you can plainly see that from the lackluster story and flat situations. This seems to be a filler before going on to Shrek 4 and having the kids.

It was bland and, dare I say, <I>boring</I>, DWs' worst film yet. Andrew Adamson was missed, and the original concept of Shrek taking on the Arthurian legend was wasted...it wasn't about that at all. And it wasn't about what the promos have been going on about.

In the end, it wasn't about anything. :(

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9067
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » June 24th, 2007, 1:20 pm


The babies themselves freaked me out. I already thought this, but seeing them move I couldn't get this image out of my head: http://www.olgabaclanova.com/picture_ga ... eaks_6.jpg

That's so weird Ben.


I actually thought the EXACT same thing the first time I saw them. (When the pics came out I mean.)

They freaked me out a bit too, but I kinda got more used to them as time went on. I definetely see where you're coming from, however.


I do see your points...you make a lot of sense. I enjoyed the film a lot but it's lacking when you put it up to hard scrutiny....*sighs* :(
I guess I'm biased as a DW mega-fan, but even I see that it needed more...ESPECIALLY the Mike Meyers not really "doing Shrek" thing.

I guess the film did tug on my heartstrings here and there though. Also, I thought Charming's character was well fleshed out, (much more so than in S2) but TOTALLY not evil enough. :?


************************************


Artie ruled though!! :D
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

Post Reply