Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 25869
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » March 10th, 2006, 12:26 pm
Hmmm...
While it's obviously not out the bounds of reason that Pixar would include such a reference, I can't help but think that this is just a coikidink.
After all, that model of Fiat is just that model of Fiat - of course they're going to look similar.
I think if its front light had been smashed/it was the same color/had the same license plate/had the same bent bumper then it could have been taken more as a literal reference, but two similar cars do not an in-joke make.
At least for me...anyone else have thoughts on this one?

-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 9107
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Post
by ShyViolet » March 10th, 2006, 12:28 pm
Those are my thoughts too. Actually, they both kinda remind me of Benny the Cab from Roger Rabbit.

You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 1419
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Post
by Macaluso » March 10th, 2006, 2:45 pm
Which begs the question.
Why isn't BENNY doing a cameo. sheesh.
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 3845
- Joined: May 31st, 2005
- Location: Maryland
Post
by Meg » March 10th, 2006, 2:47 pm
I'll agree with Ben here.
"Which begs the question.
Why isn't BENNY doing a cameo. sheesh."
What, have you already seen it?

-
Post
by GeorgeC » March 10th, 2006, 7:44 pm
One correction, though.
It's not really proper to credit Miyazaki with Lupin III. Miyazaki didn't originate the character.
Lupin III was created by Monkey Punch and the manga/anime character was in itself a spin-off of the original French character, Lupin.
What Miyazaki did with Lupin III was direct a few of the original (early 1970s) animated TV series' episodes as well as one of the early Lupin III feature films, "Castle of Cagliostro."
-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 25869
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » March 11th, 2006, 2:24 pm
Benny, Herbie... they should give 'em all quick cameo shots, like they did with all the Disney dogs on Oliver And Company's "Why Should I Worry" sequence.
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 3845
- Joined: May 31st, 2005
- Location: Maryland
Post
by Meg » March 14th, 2006, 2:38 pm
Thanks for the link! Man, I cannot get over how gorgeous this movie looks.
-
- AV Team

- Posts: 6755
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Post
by Dacey » March 14th, 2006, 7:15 pm
I have yet to get all hyped up about "Cars" (still haven't seen the trailer that everyone's talking about), but I'm sure it will be good. Maybe not Pixar's greatest, but it should still be good.
And I like Mater. He's crazy-looking.

"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 3845
- Joined: May 31st, 2005
- Location: Maryland
Post
by Meg » March 15th, 2006, 2:46 pm
Wow wow wow, it looks soooo cool...I watched the entire trailer in slow-mo...
-
- AV Team

- Posts: 6755
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Post
by Dacey » March 15th, 2006, 3:58 pm
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 1419
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Post
by Macaluso » March 16th, 2006, 10:57 am
That new Cars poster is absolutely awesome!
-
- AV Founder

- Posts: 25869
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » March 16th, 2006, 11:09 am
One thing that surprised me over at the AICN post on the current ShoWest...
John Lasseter apparently came on this week and said that they just finished the film and only had the cast/crew party a couple of days ago.
So...wasn't Cars supposed to come out this past Christmas?? And wasn't the delay on the film due to a summer release date and not because of any re-tinkering?
So how come Cars was just finished only recently? Oh yeah, we'll get the "we wanted to spend the right time on it to get it right and this allowed us to" blurbs, but I reckon that just a little re-tinkering went in to this.
Whatever, the new posters and trailers are bringing more and more people around to this one, even if it just turn out to be Pixar's buddy-buddy formula with motors instead of toys, bugs, monsters, fish or superheroes...
-
- AV Forum Member

- Posts: 3845
- Joined: May 31st, 2005
- Location: Maryland
Post
by Meg » March 16th, 2006, 5:23 pm
Cars worries me because so many people seem intent on hating it for the sole reason that it stars talking cars. I only know a few people who want to see it - the ones who don't are like, "Talking cars? No thanks." Uhm, let's look back a bit...
Pixar made talking toys work.
They made talking bugs work.
They made talking fish work.
The made talking superheroes work.
I'm pretty sure they can make talking Cars work. (Not directing this on anybody here, btw, just at people I know)