Post
by Ben » December 17th, 2024, 4:09 am
Khan overshadowed The Motionless Picture for just about everyone! With the characters back to themselves but the added depth of a big film, this is how it should be done. Had Trek II performed the same way as the first (it wasn’t a flop, but wasn’t a smash, which is why the next few were made on "on a budget"), I think that would have been it for Trek in the movies, and maybe forever everywhere else too (gasp!), but Meyer pulled it out of the bag and got things on track, fortuitously.
However, 1979 was about The Black Hole for me. Not intentionally, but I just got taken to see that over what was known from reviews to be a well-intentioned but fairly "boring" ST film. (Weirdly, I remember some rodeo supporting feature with it that seemed to go on for ages…I never found out what that was, haha!)
Bob Wise was a great director, one of my faves as he’d started as an editor, but he made a grandiose 2001 instead of a Trek popcorn film, or at least a kind of mind-meld between the two. His approach wasn't wrong — this was Trek writ large for the biggest of screens after all — and the story wasn’t all down to hm, but it lost the rough 'n' readiness that the later (cheaper) films would retain.
I'd been watching the BBC's reruns of TOS on television, so knew there was a Trek film because of all the poster ads on the back of the DC comics at the time, but it wasn't until 1983's Spock that I really became "aware" of Trek as a film entity at age ten, since the ad campaigns for that were very aggressive due to wanting to build on Khan's commercial and critical success.
So I must have seen Khan about then, on TV or video, as I don’t remember catching TMP until much later, probably on TV. I eventually saw it "properly" in an all-day six-movie marathon they did when Undiscovered Country came out which, by then, I was naturally totally into the movies, though pretty much saw them all on video before that point. I still need to watch the newer version of the Director’s Cut…!