.. especially since the identity of the villain wasn't any sort of major plot point.EricJ wrote: ↑May 23rd, 2022, 5:21 pmAnd even that reshot ending is starting to blow up in their face, as more Disney-fan YouTube pundits are taking up the previously-discussed "Tasteless Bobby Driscoll context" talking point.
Hip deconstructive pop-culture irony: The only way to win is not to play.
Why not make the villain Fat Cat, or Professor Nimnul..?
.. or, heck, if it had to be a core 'fab five'-era character, why not Peg-Leg Pete (which is where my mind went, when "Sweet Pete" was first mentioned in the movie..?
My singular positive comment is that there was much to enjoy -- design & animation-wise -- in this movie. This is kinda what I expect an Amazing World of Gumball movie might've looked like.


I'm really not sure who the story is meant to be for, though .. not me, anyway.
