
Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
Anastasia and Drizella are getting the Maleficent and Cruella treatment. Currently untitled and no word if it will have any correlation to the 2015 remake. Sure, why not. 

- AV Founder
- Posts: 25884
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
I, er...can’t wait...?
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
And here I was hoping for a Madame Medusa spin-off! Maybe next time. 

- AV Team
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
Given the star power (assuming they are in fact the stars), it’s extremely evident this will be a comedy. And given their ages, I’m assuming it will serve as a “sequel” to the events of Cinderella.
And Disney made Anastasia nice in not one, but two Cinderella films, so this won’t be as “bold” of a move as Maleficent was.
And Disney made Anastasia nice in not one, but two Cinderella films, so this won’t be as “bold” of a move as Maleficent was.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 5206
- Joined: September 27th, 2007
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
And, to add to the confusion, there's ANOTHER "Evil stepsisters' side of the story" chik-flik comedy in the works, from another comic who Really Wanted To Write/Direct, as Amy Poehler wants to do one about two modern urban Asian sisters. And a musical, no less.
I'm guessing these things go in cycles--First the Little Women rush, then the Jane Austen rush, then the Emily Dickinson rush, and then the Cinderella-Deconstruction rush...Another Snow White one should be happening any minute, it's been ten years.
(And on the subject of Wiig & Mumolo, whom Disney clearly snapped up to self-market on the "success" they were persuaded was going to happen to "Barb & Star Go to Vista Del Mar":
Did anyone remember sitting through that three-hour never-ending first vanity B&SGtVDM trailer, and thinking "Are we supposed to KNOW these characters already, the way they're being star-marketed in our face? Like, is it a recent SNL sketch, or some Australian sitcom where the movie version came over here instead, or...Could we get a hint??
")
I'm guessing these things go in cycles--First the Little Women rush, then the Jane Austen rush, then the Emily Dickinson rush, and then the Cinderella-Deconstruction rush...Another Snow White one should be happening any minute, it's been ten years.
(And on the subject of Wiig & Mumolo, whom Disney clearly snapped up to self-market on the "success" they were persuaded was going to happen to "Barb & Star Go to Vista Del Mar":
Did anyone remember sitting through that three-hour never-ending first vanity B&SGtVDM trailer, and thinking "Are we supposed to KNOW these characters already, the way they're being star-marketed in our face? Like, is it a recent SNL sketch, or some Australian sitcom where the movie version came over here instead, or...Could we get a hint??

- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 756
- Joined: April 8th, 2020
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
The thing I don't get is what's with all these Cinderella adaptations suddenly. It's just overdone in my opinion.
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 5206
- Joined: September 27th, 2007
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
[Removed to be nice to everybody] fans tend to centrate on the story aspect of Cindy's stepsisters being unattractive and picking on her. Which is technically not in the original tale.
Most of the [same demographic] also like making a big personally indulgent story-deconstructive show of sticking up for the "overlooked" characters, rather than that stuck-up good-looking prom-queen who runs off with the good shoes, dress and guy.
Because either way you go, there's always someone to blame.
Most of the [same demographic] also like making a big personally indulgent story-deconstructive show of sticking up for the "overlooked" characters, rather than that stuck-up good-looking prom-queen who runs off with the good shoes, dress and guy.
Because either way you go, there's always someone to blame.

- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 124
- Joined: November 26th, 2007
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
Your post makes no sense. 

- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
And that's different how..? Clearly the redacted parts would've been "female" because that's the kind of sexist person Eric is.
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25884
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
What’s wrong with being sexy?
(Kudos to anyone who gets that.)
(Kudos to anyone who gets that.)

- AV Team
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25884
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Re: Disney's Cinderella Evil Stepsisters (Live-Action)
ROCK and ROLL!!! 
