Tom & Jerry
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25726
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
There was hardly any music in the Deitch cartoons...I remember them being more about sound effects and ambiance...quite weird.
Also, I'd say his designs were much closer to Bill & Joe's originals than Chuck Jones' coyote-esque redos. Deitch (coming before Jones, remember) seemed to capture the early Tom & Jerry even if they were "simpler" lined and drawn for limited animation.
Also, I'd say his designs were much closer to Bill & Joe's originals than Chuck Jones' coyote-esque redos. Deitch (coming before Jones, remember) seemed to capture the early Tom & Jerry even if they were "simpler" lined and drawn for limited animation.
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 338
- Joined: October 31st, 2008
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: September 27th, 2007
Chuck's T&J's were chronologically somewhere between "I Was a Teenage Thumb" and his 80's coyote redo's, back when he didn't have Michael Maltese writing for him anymore, and Chuck writing his own material was precious, winsome and overbearingly stylized--Ben wrote:Also, I'd say his designs were much closer to Bill & Joe's originals than Chuck Jones' coyote-esque redos.
How many times (besides the neo-Coyotes) do we have to see a bomb go off with the cartoon sound effect "Gigantic Explosion!"?
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: July 23rd, 2006
- Location: Yuma, Arizona USA
- Contact:
UPDATE, GUYS:
From http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Tom-Je ... tion/11409
The T&J shorts on Tom and Jerry - The Chuck Jones Collection will be presented in their originally-designed-for-theaters 1.85:1 aspect ratio.
From http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Tom-Je ... tion/11409
The T&J shorts on Tom and Jerry - The Chuck Jones Collection will be presented in their originally-designed-for-theaters 1.85:1 aspect ratio.
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25726
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Excellent! These shorts were made in the open matte process for later TV exhibition. Those were the versions presented on the LaserDisc boxed collection. I was interested in having them on DVD, but now the widescreen framing will be used, there's even more reason to have them since it means I can stop blowing up the image if I want to run one of these in that ratio.
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 14
- Joined: November 19th, 2007
- Location: New Orleans, LA
- Contact:
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 376
- Joined: March 19th, 2010
- Location: Probably Cinemark
Re: Animation Blu ray releases...
Uh, Ben, don't know if you find this interesting but Tom and Jerry...IS OCMING TO BLU-RAY!!
http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Tom-Je ... me-1/15578
FINALLY!
http://www.tvshowsondvd.com/news/Tom-Je ... me-1/15578
FINALLY!
I love all things cinema, from silent movies to world cinema to animated cinema to big blockbusters to documentaries and everything in between!
- AV Founder
- Posts: 7395
- Joined: October 23rd, 2004
- Location: SaskaTOON, Canada
Frankly,
I'd care a lot more if WB finally did a proper Blu ray release of the Tex Avery MGM shorts.
Seems to be a long-shot at this point in time but many people have waited for a new collection of those shorts since the LD box 18-19 years ago.
A few of these shorts have popped as extras in classic WB movie DVDs but so far no official collection on 5" disc.
I'd care a lot more if WB finally did a proper Blu ray release of the Tex Avery MGM shorts.
Seems to be a long-shot at this point in time but many people have waited for a new collection of those shorts since the LD box 18-19 years ago.
A few of these shorts have popped as extras in classic WB movie DVDs but so far no official collection on 5" disc.
- AV Founder
- Posts: 7395
- Joined: October 23rd, 2004
- Location: SaskaTOON, Canada
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25726
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Yeah: I couldn't write more the other day because my keyboard packed up, but I was going to add that it seems they're using established characters (and ones that must continue to sell well given how many compilations they keep putting out) to test the waters.
T&J might not be the first thing that collectors would be clambering for, but it's in the right ballpark and, if this sells well enough, maybe we can look forward to an eventual Avery collection. I'm kind of surprised that they're not going the Bugs 'n' Daffy route, but maybe the reality is that those characters just don't shift enough units outside the collector core audience?
I do think it's going to be a cold day when we start to see the big kind of sets we used to get on DVD, but this is an interesting step in the right direction, the first true classic animation compendium (and for collectors too!), and will hopefully open the gates to more of the same.
I wouldn't be surprised if we don't start seeing the Looney Tunes after this, but not in the same configurations as before. My guess would be for slimmed down 40 cartoons a set type deals, maybe the "best" of the first two Golden sets for a Volume One, etc. I think anything coming out on Blu at this point, like this T&J set, will be much more character-centric than The Dover Boys or High Note, for example (although if they're brave enough they could put out a real core collector set down the line).
Anyway...these are the earlier, funnier Tom & Jerrys, so I'll be in for this and hoping for more!
T&J might not be the first thing that collectors would be clambering for, but it's in the right ballpark and, if this sells well enough, maybe we can look forward to an eventual Avery collection. I'm kind of surprised that they're not going the Bugs 'n' Daffy route, but maybe the reality is that those characters just don't shift enough units outside the collector core audience?
I do think it's going to be a cold day when we start to see the big kind of sets we used to get on DVD, but this is an interesting step in the right direction, the first true classic animation compendium (and for collectors too!), and will hopefully open the gates to more of the same.
I wouldn't be surprised if we don't start seeing the Looney Tunes after this, but not in the same configurations as before. My guess would be for slimmed down 40 cartoons a set type deals, maybe the "best" of the first two Golden sets for a Volume One, etc. I think anything coming out on Blu at this point, like this T&J set, will be much more character-centric than The Dover Boys or High Note, for example (although if they're brave enough they could put out a real core collector set down the line).
Anyway...these are the earlier, funnier Tom & Jerrys, so I'll be in for this and hoping for more!
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: September 27th, 2007
Warner thinks T&J stayed in the public eye, because they could safely hitch them up in DTV's to whatever other marketable Time-Warner corporate property Warner wanted to promote: "T&J Meet Sherlock Holmes"..."T&J Meet Wizard of Oz (MGM Version)" After all, fans said, who cared what corporate indignities they subjected Itchy & Scratchy to; nobody liked the characters anyway.T&J might not be the first thing that collectors would be clambering for, but it's in the right ballpark and, if this sells well enough, maybe we can look forward to an eventual Avery collection. I'm kind of surprised that they're not going the Bugs 'n' Daffy route, but maybe the reality is that those characters just don't shift enough units outside the collector core audience?
But OTOH, Warner also knows that if they ever tried pushing their corporate-synergy luck and made a DTV "Bugs & Daffy Meet Harry Potter and Batman", true Bugs fans would be storming the studio gates within minutes, with bricks, bottles, and shouts of "Remember Space Jam!"
(Even Warner's last attempt at selling Bugs mainstream fell victim to angry fans when the studio tried cutting corners--They tried selling a widescreen-cropped Best-of Bugs for mass-market, and the fans rammed it back down the studio's throat.)
So now, Warner thinks "more kids remember" T&J than the Looneys, because they can sell T&J at Wal-Mart, but they can only sell Bugs to the prestige collectors.
Uh, there's "more" remembering, and there's "better" remembering.