[quote="Mickey A"]Do you have time to tell us what doesn't add up? I have never been the biggest Star Wars fan, but things like that still interest me.[/quote]
There are many things the prequels brought in that don't add up and just CONTRADICT what was established in the original trilogy...
Here are a couple of the big ones that really, really get some people going nuts.
Point 1) In The Empire Strikes Back (Episode V, TESB), Obi-Wan tells Luke to seek out Yoda, "the Jedi Master who trained me...," yet in Episode I, released 19 years AFTER TESB, Obi-Wan's master/mentor is some shag-tailed, hippie-looking fellow named Qui-Gon Jin!
Point 2) Lucas makes a big deal about mythology and being influenced by the works of Joseph Campbell, BUT YET HE DOES HIS VERY BEST TO DEMYTHOLOGIZE AND TAKE THE MYSTICISM OUT OF STAR WARS IN THE PREQUELS!
From the first three films, it's assumed that not everybody has the Force and it's this mystical thing that comes and goes with generations, yet in the re-write of Star Wars folklore in Episode I, you have to have this microscopic crap called "midichlorians" to have the Force! Apparently, the "Chosen One," Anakin, has the highest concentration of midichlorians seen since Yoda! WTF is the deal with that?
Point 3) Obi-Wan makes a big deal out of telling Luke in Episode IV (A New Hope, the original Star Wars movie, ANH) that Anakin (Luke's father) "was the best starfighter pilot in the galaxy, a cunning warrior,... and a good friend." However, in the last prequel and this upcoming film, Anakin acts like anything BUT a very good friend. By the end of Episode III, you'll see why that last bit that Obi-Wan said in Episode IV is both ridiculous and a flat-out lie.
Point 4) Clones. They're just a bad idea and people hate them in general. We hate them in comics (Spider-Man fans remember, right?) AND in movies. Why oh why did Lucas have to make Boba Fett a kid in Episode II who was Jango Fett's clone?
Now, I've never completely understood WHY people like Boba Fett so much considering he has less than fifteen minutes screen time in the previous trilogy, but even I understand that making him a clone of another fellow WAS A VERY BAD IDEA... Generally, I liked Jango Fett in Episode II and he was the best thing BESIDES Obi-Wan in that film, but putting in Boba Fett as a kiddie clone was not a bright thing to do.
Point 5) Does anybody NOT get the point that Chancellor Palpatine, the Emperor, and Darth Sidious are one and the same character? Talk about a non-secret! You have to be retarded not to see the connection and frankly I think Lucas wasted his time with the Sidious subplot...
Point 6) How could Padme fall for a psycho like Anakin? It's supposed to be this great romance yet with the sloppy acting Anakin comes off as this semi-rabid slobbering puppy-dog stalking kid!
Seriously, it MUST be the "work of the Force" that Luke and Leia are around by the end of Episode III! Their parents (Padme and Anakin) did NOT have a great romance and Padme and Anakin's relationship does NOT make sense based on what's presented on the screen in Episode II and I would assume Episode III.
What makes this all sad is the sloppy research and writing on the prequels done by Star Wars' creator, George Lucas.
If it had been a complete hack writer who had NEVER seen the original trilogy, the mistakes would be more understandable but still hated by most fans. The fact that it's Star Wars' own creator who is putting in these contradictions 20 years AFTER the fact the original films drives people nuts.
It's just plain, sloppy, lazy writing and bad directing...
... and yet most of us will STILL be in line the first weekend Episode III is out to see the darn film!
