Spider-Man 3
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Spider-Man 3 out on DVD on Oct. 30th
http://www.comicscontinuum.com/stories/ ... /index.htm
"Sony Pictures Home Entertainment hs announced an Oct. 30 release for Spider-Man 3 on DVD.
Spider-Man 3 will be available in several versions, including a single-disc release, a two-disc Special Edition release, PSP, and a three-pack DVD release which will include Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 on DVD with collectible O-Ring packaging.
Also available is the Spider-Man High Definition Trilogy, a three-pack release of all three films on Blu-ray High-Def allowing fans an exclusive opportunity to collect both Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 in high definition, along with Spider-Man 2.1[sic 2.5] and Spider-Man 3.
Spider-Man 3 will also be available as a stand-alone two-disc release on Blu-ray High-Def.
The film has grossed more than $888 million worldwide. Spider-Man 3 set numerous records, including the biggest three-day total in box-office history ($151 million), biggest single day gross in box-office history ($59.8 million) and the top all-time worldwide opening ($231 million)."
**************************
TheDigitalBits.com has covered some of this already, but this is a neat package that summarizes everything.
The Blu-Ray Trilogy Collection will have the 2.5 cut of Spider-Man 2 in it in addition to the theatrical cut of Spider-Man 2. That's already been confirmed by TheDigitalBits.
This is something I might be eyeing myself as I get closer to making a decision on High-Def.
I don't think High-Def will do a darn for most animation titles which weren't theatrical releases in the first place, but, from the latest tests I've seen, it makes a SIGNIFICANT difference for live-action.
"Sony Pictures Home Entertainment hs announced an Oct. 30 release for Spider-Man 3 on DVD.
Spider-Man 3 will be available in several versions, including a single-disc release, a two-disc Special Edition release, PSP, and a three-pack DVD release which will include Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 on DVD with collectible O-Ring packaging.
Also available is the Spider-Man High Definition Trilogy, a three-pack release of all three films on Blu-ray High-Def allowing fans an exclusive opportunity to collect both Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 in high definition, along with Spider-Man 2.1[sic 2.5] and Spider-Man 3.
Spider-Man 3 will also be available as a stand-alone two-disc release on Blu-ray High-Def.
The film has grossed more than $888 million worldwide. Spider-Man 3 set numerous records, including the biggest three-day total in box-office history ($151 million), biggest single day gross in box-office history ($59.8 million) and the top all-time worldwide opening ($231 million)."
**************************
TheDigitalBits.com has covered some of this already, but this is a neat package that summarizes everything.
The Blu-Ray Trilogy Collection will have the 2.5 cut of Spider-Man 2 in it in addition to the theatrical cut of Spider-Man 2. That's already been confirmed by TheDigitalBits.
This is something I might be eyeing myself as I get closer to making a decision on High-Def.
I don't think High-Def will do a darn for most animation titles which weren't theatrical releases in the first place, but, from the latest tests I've seen, it makes a SIGNIFICANT difference for live-action.
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
That sounds awesome! I don't own the original or sequel, so I may consider getting that trilogy box set. (DVD)
And before Ben asks: Spider-Man 3 villains revealed
And before Ben asks: Spider-Man 3 villains revealed
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Spider Man 3: The Abridged Script
Funnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunny!!!!!!!
Just FYI, I saw it yet another time, (for free) I still think it's got a ton of flaws but I had a good time nonetheless.
(Edited a bit for language)
http://www.the-editing-room.com/
Funnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunnyfunny!!!!!!!
Just FYI, I saw it yet another time, (for free) I still think it's got a ton of flaws but I had a good time nonetheless.
(Edited a bit for language)
http://www.the-editing-room.com/
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1347
- Joined: January 23rd, 2006
- Location: The Middle of Nowhere
Here goes another Marvel-bashing frenzy. *sigh* Why do Marvel movies always get bashed the most when they're some of the best movies coming out and have been for years. For example, Million Dollar Baby was a good movie and all, but if I'm coming home after a long day, I'd probably opt to watch Daredevil or Fantastic Four. We should all be thanking Hollywood for the current abundance of superhero movies, but any time a new one comes out, especially if it's Marvel, all I ever hear are knocks and complaints. Am I the only one who feels that Marvel hasn't done a bad movie yet in the post-Blade era?
Speaking specifically of Spider-Man 3, what's the problem? Sure it wasn't as good as part 2 (I don't know that anything they came up with could have been), but it was still a good movie. If you must know (and this is something I heard in an interview), they originally were going to try and split the story into two films, but couldn't figure out a satisfactory middle-of-the-story climax. If the whole "dark Peter" plot seems rushed, it's because they weren't able to give it proper breathing room. Yes, it's true they tried to cram too much story into the runtime, but as I always say, we should judge a film for what it is, not what it could/should have been and by that measure, I think Spider-Man 3 definitely lives up to the previous two installments. However, I feel that they ended the overall story perfectly and they should stop there. Spidey has earned a place in the Cool Trilogy Club, but if Sony goes for a part four and blows it, it'll tarnish the reputation of the whole series in the eyes of the audience (much the same way that Shrek The Third has). Let's all hope that doesn't happen.
Speaking specifically of Spider-Man 3, what's the problem? Sure it wasn't as good as part 2 (I don't know that anything they came up with could have been), but it was still a good movie. If you must know (and this is something I heard in an interview), they originally were going to try and split the story into two films, but couldn't figure out a satisfactory middle-of-the-story climax. If the whole "dark Peter" plot seems rushed, it's because they weren't able to give it proper breathing room. Yes, it's true they tried to cram too much story into the runtime, but as I always say, we should judge a film for what it is, not what it could/should have been and by that measure, I think Spider-Man 3 definitely lives up to the previous two installments. However, I feel that they ended the overall story perfectly and they should stop there. Spidey has earned a place in the Cool Trilogy Club, but if Sony goes for a part four and blows it, it'll tarnish the reputation of the whole series in the eyes of the audience (much the same way that Shrek The Third has). Let's all hope that doesn't happen.
The Official Lugofilm Ltd Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/bartsimpson83
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
I actually think it's more because Sam Raimi didn't want it in the film in the first place. It just seems to me that he was much more invested in the (lame) subplot of Sandman and Venom/Brock was just something he squeezed in 'cause he had to.If the whole "dark Peter" plot seems rushed, it's because they weren't able to give it proper breathing room.
It's just so hard to take, 'cause here Raimi has a great story to work with (dark Peter/dark Venom/Eddie all reflections of each other) as well as at least three wonderful supporting actors with real talent, and yet he gives the most screen time/dialogue to the boring characters being played by actors who so obviously are only doing it for the money. (And I mean Dunst and Maguire, in case there was any doubt.
*SPOILERS*
Sure it wasn't as good as part 2 (I don't know that anything they came up with could have been),
I have to say, I'm not so sure about that. With that talent they had at their disposal, (James, Topher, Bryce, JK Simmons AND Dylan Baker?? ) coupled with a story that has the potential to be VERY dark (as we all assumed it would be) I think they might have even been able to top part 2 if they wanted to.
Part 2 was great and all, but never went as dark as it could have gone. Dock Ock was awesome, but never hard-core evil. There was no ruthless, alien presence and the only "demons" Peter had to face were: "Should I be Spider-Man or not?"
In Part 3 Peter's struggles would have come from a deeper, darker source. The film could have been absolutely amazing if Raimi invested himself in it more.....key being "could have."
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25715
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK