Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » August 17th, 2008, 6:23 am
Ben wrote:Daniel wrote:Oh, and confirmation: LMII will be getting the Special Edition treatment.
Yay! A new game!
Yeah! I can't wait! the ultimate gift!
.
.
Did you knew that Queen Athena died while watching that movie?.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25715
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » August 17th, 2008, 7:43 am
I'm probably not as enthusiastic as you, Once. I was being sarcastic.
And someone dies while watching LMII? I'm not actually surprised!
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » August 17th, 2008, 10:59 am
In case you didn't noticed I was sarcastic
.
Me neither,thought she actually seen herself in that film (She played old "Ariel").
Daniel-Well,I don't think any cheapquel's animation can get to the level of the original film's,the animation is okay,thought the animation in Enchanted Tales was better,even the animation in Cinderella III looked a little weird.
Last edited by
Once Upon A Dream on August 18th, 2008, 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 608
- Joined: January 22nd, 2007
Post
by Whippet Angel » August 17th, 2008, 6:54 pm
Ben wrote:And someone dies while watching LMII? I'm not actually surprised!
I died a little inside as I watched it....
-
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25715
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » August 18th, 2008, 8:43 am
Awwee, did the bad ikkle LMII suck ikkle Whippet's soul away?
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » August 18th, 2008, 12:45 pm
Whippet Angel wrote:Ben wrote:And someone dies while watching LMII? I'm not actually surprised!
I died a little inside as I watched it....
Well,I always suffer while watching it,when I first saw it I almost cried.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 459
- Joined: December 21st, 2007
Post
by Dusterian » August 18th, 2008, 1:42 pm
Yea,
Once was being sarcastic about the new DVD game, too.
Hey, I really want to know something.
Ben, or anyone who can help, I caught that there's this technique where things move only about two frames at a time, and some things move on a different frame than other things move. Here's an example. The merpeople don't move, but the bubbles do:
I also caught this happening in The Little Mermaid II. So...is this a TV quality thing, a poor quality thing...or actually, something done in even Disney's best theatrical films?
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1471
- Joined: October 7th, 2007
- Location: Unknown
Post
by Once Upon A Dream » August 18th, 2008, 1:52 pm
Dusterian wrote:Yeah, Once was being sarcastic about the new DVD game, too.
Exactly.
[img]http://i43.tinypic.com/bfqbtk.jpg[/img]
-
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25715
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Post
by Ben » August 18th, 2008, 5:27 pm
It's done in all animation, Dust.
Most animation is actually drawn on twos (12 frames out of every 24). Even the Disney classics, if you actually look at most movement. 24 frames (or ones) are usually reserved for very fast movement or very slow, emotional acting.
In this case, the bubbles are more than likely a CG effect, which may as well be rendered out in 24 frames for more fluid movement, while the characters are typically moving at 12 frames. Just some of the tricks used to make some animation look/feel better than it actually is...
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 608
- Joined: January 22nd, 2007
Post
by Whippet Angel » August 18th, 2008, 11:40 pm
Ben wrote:Awwee, did the bad ikkle LMII suck ikkle Whippet's soul away?
Yes.... Yes, it did. O___O And it took me a very long time to recover.
Which is why I refuse to touch TLMIII with a 40ft pole (still gonna read your review, though
).
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » August 19th, 2008, 2:08 pm
I forgot to post this! Jim Hill's
take on LM:AB.
Jim Hill wrote:Let's start with the good news: "The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning" isn't nearly as awful as "The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea" was.
Yay!
But it's what we've been predicting. If Marina wanted Triton's position, that would
maybe make her more of a baddie, but wanting Sebastians...? Lame.
Is anyone actually interested in the DVD deals?
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 459
- Joined: December 21st, 2007
Post
by Dusterian » August 19th, 2008, 7:25 pm
Thanks Ben, and actually, I think the bubbles are on the two's, too. As in, they move in one frame, then the merpeople move, then the bubbles, etc. I definately caught this happening with a dolphin and a splash of water in TLMII. The water moved, then the dolphin.
Yes, Marina should have wanted to take over as ruler and then turned out to be Ursula.
QUESTION: Any reason my signature is a link, not showing the picture?
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Post
by Daniel » August 19th, 2008, 7:31 pm
It's because you don't have the Img tag - [img]IMAGE%20LINK[/img]. That should work.
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 459
- Joined: December 21st, 2007
Post
by Dusterian » August 20th, 2008, 1:46 pm
Thanks, but I discovered that it's too big, that's why it's not working.
Also, I made this showing that yes, the bubbles don't movie every frame either, they're on the two's, too.
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 17
- Joined: February 22nd, 2008
- Location: CT
-
Contact:
Post
by The Zany Bishojo Evalana » August 21st, 2008, 2:53 am
I don't know where else to say this, but I have to get it off my chest: the only reason I will see this at all is because of Benjamin.
[url=http://rabbithutchiscalling.blogspot.com][img]http://i245.photobucket.com/albums/gg78/evalana/sig_feet.png[/img][/url]