
Here's a comparison of the image in the video and the image in the Cinderella trailer (also found on the same site) that I'll post here, the rest are on the link below.
Trailer:

Music Video:

http://hometown.aol.com/villianmg/Cinderella14.html
Cool really cool, but i think in Dvd will look greaterWonderlicious wrote:This is (for me, anyway) oldish news, yet these were found on a webpage that a forum member on Ultimate Disney made. They originate from a Disney Channel preview of the Disney Channel Circle of Stars music video (oh dear...) that will be appearing on the upcoming Cinderella DVD. The restored images look rich and fruity (even though they are low quality) and so far I'm projecting them to be up to the standards of the Alice in Wonderland and Bambi restorations.
Here's a comparison of the image in the video and the image in the Cinderella trailer (also found on the same site) that I'll post here, the rest are on the link below.
http://hometown.aol.com/villianmg/Cinderella14.html
PlotCinderella III: A Twist in Time is the second direct-to-video film sequel to the 1950 Walt Disney animated classic Cinderella, after 2002's Cinderella II: Dreams Come True. The film is scheduled for release on February 6, 2007.
Yes, I know another sequel thread, but I just had toLady Tremaine, Cinderella's wicked stepmother, discovers the existence of the Fairy Godmother who helped Cinderella win Prince Charming's heart by using magic in the original film. Tremaine steals the Fairy Godmother's magic wand and reverses time, changing everything back to the way it was before - Cinderella still lives with Lady Tremaine and has to do her chores every day and anything else that she asks for. Cinderella and her mice friends therefore have to find a way to reverse time the other way round again before it's too late. And this time, without using magic. Can they do it?
...and a bomb. Seriously, do you think that a Cinderella III was absolutely necessary? "And they lived happily ever after" was the end of the first film -- I think that should have ended it, don't you?Daniel Jake wrote:
Its sad that its Australia's last film, but hey, at least their going out with a bang!
-Discuss
You could say that again -- heheh.Ben wrote: Mitch...would love to hear some stories!![]()
Didn't Roy Disney say that about California Adventure?'Walt would be proud' used to mean a big deal,
I also think this sounds cool!Its sad that its Australia's last film, but hey, at least their going out with a bang!
That hurtBen wrote:'Walt would be proud' <I>used</I> to mean a big deal, but now it's a way to wash over the lighter fans who accept that stuff. I guess it's working!
Sequel, I should've been more clearBen wrote: And is this Australia's last film? Or their last <I>sequel</I>?
That's true. However, I don't consider many sequels, such as Cinderella III undeeded. But, thats just meBen wrote: He wasn't opposed to sequels per se, just un-needed ones!
Sorry about thatJames wrote:I was talking specifically of what I mentioned in my post - Cinderella and time travel.
That's good to know Vi!ShyViolet wrote:I also think this sounds cool!I"m excited too.
The Evil Stepmther is such a b****.![]()
(J/K)