"Happily N'Ever After"

Post by **Daniel** » January 3rd, 2007, 1:36 am

If it was a sequel, you and everybody else would've already -- ha!

True, though.

Post by **Mitch** » January 3rd, 2007, 3:35 pm

Danny - Ha! Yeah, I guess you're right about that.

Two days, eleven hours, twenty-five minutes and counting!

Post by **Daniel** » January 3rd, 2007, 4:43 pm

Haha, of course

Its almost here! Um, yay

Post by **ShyViolet** » January 3rd, 2007, 7:39 pm

Wow, Violet really wants to know about this!

Yes, the suspense was killing me!

It was right up there with the Best Animated Feature Oscar winner.

Post by **ShyViolet** » January 4th, 2007, 5:36 am

About HNA:

I love the font: reminds me of Aladdin.

The hero and heroine (I guess...?) both resemble Keanu Reeves.

Post by **Groaning** » January 4th, 2007, 5:47 am

Happily N'Ever After looks like crap.

Post by **Daniel** » January 4th, 2007, 3:22 pm

Welcome to the club, Groening!

Post by **Ben** » January 4th, 2007, 3:29 pm

Just say it G.

Post by **Mitch** » January 5th, 2007, 11:16 am

Well, whoop-de-doo: Happily N'Ever After just bombed at the box office! Not surprising, especially seeing as the ratings were no higher than a C-.

Oh well. The film gave itself a shot, but unfortunately got shot down. Pretty expectable, if you ask me.

Post by **Daniel** » January 5th, 2007, 3:06 pm

Or, if you aks me

Typical, I'm not surprised at all.

I predict, the movie comes in at #7

yay, no sequel! (Yes, its me)

Post by **Mitch** » January 5th, 2007, 3:55 pm

Daniel Jake wrote: yay, no sequel! (Yes, its me)

Are you sure you're not an impersonator or something, 'cause I think I misread that....

(snigger) I'm joking. I'm joking.

Yeah, it didn't look (or sound) all that good in the first place. The computer animation seems adequate, as always, but that does nothing to strengthen the story. Too bad, too. It could have been alot better, story-wise.

Post by **Daniel** » January 5th, 2007, 4:15 pm

I assure you, I am the real Daniel

see, even I have my standards!

You can say that again, Mitch! It just looked awful from the getgo. Shame, I liked the villain (Freda)

Ah, well. Lesson be learned!

Post by **Dacey** » January 6th, 2007, 5:25 pm

The film's not exactly a flop. Yes, it opened in seventh, but how much do you think this movie cost? It looks like it wasn't very expensive.

Post by **Mitch** » January 6th, 2007, 8:18 pm

Wendy's Jane - It was probably half as much as Shrek cost; maybe less. It doesn't look like a very expensive film to me either, especially when you consider the colors they choose. Heh.

Still, it's only been out for a couple of days. I suppose we should wait a little longer and see how it long it lasts. I'll give it two weeks....

Post by **Daniel** » January 6th, 2007, 8:37 pm

I'll give it a week.