DreamWorks' SHREK
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Ahhhh, now I want a Shrek cup!! I think I really want a Puss or an Ogre Babies one.
Didn't PDI-DreamWorks also work on Madagascar, if I'm not mistaken?
But I do agree, I hope they stop after 4 as well.
Have a great time! Maybe you could post on it like you did on MTR? Thanks ahead of time.
I kind of hope they do stop after Shrek 4/Puss, though .. if only for the sake of those artists at the PDI campus in Northern California; they had an amazing first movie with Antz (nearly 10 years ago!) .. but ever since then, it's been nothing but ShrekExclamation
Didn't PDI-DreamWorks also work on Madagascar, if I'm not mistaken?
But I do agree, I hope they stop after 4 as well.
I'll be seeing Shrek the Third this evening, at an ASIFA-Hollywood screening. Cool I'm hoping to enjoy it!
Have a great time! Maybe you could post on it like you did on MTR? Thanks ahead of time.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
An ogre baby is the child of two ogres.Can someone tell me what an Ogre Baby is???? www.ogrebabies.com
Last edited by ShyViolet on May 15th, 2007, 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
80% so far....well, there's only like 5 reviews but still....
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/shrek_the_third/
One thing a critic said, and I agree, is that Shrek has less impact now....BUT a big part of that is 'cause SO MANY have copied it since!!
There's a real backlash towards CGI animals now....so hopefully critics will see Shrek as "Oh, good, at least it's not another "buddy animals thing."
Well, OK, a fairy tale spoof yes--but Shrek was the first. And no matter how you feel about it....there's no denying it's better than HNA or other such knock-offs. (Can't speak for Hoodwinked since I didn't see it--but you can't deny that Shrek looks better, no matter how much you hate the look of Shrek. )
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/shrek_the_third/
One thing a critic said, and I agree, is that Shrek has less impact now....BUT a big part of that is 'cause SO MANY have copied it since!!
There's a real backlash towards CGI animals now....so hopefully critics will see Shrek as "Oh, good, at least it's not another "buddy animals thing."
Well, OK, a fairy tale spoof yes--but Shrek was the first. And no matter how you feel about it....there's no denying it's better than HNA or other such knock-offs. (Can't speak for Hoodwinked since I didn't see it--but you can't deny that Shrek looks better, no matter how much you hate the look of Shrek. )
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Sorry...
Either way, even if critics savage it or it bombs....whatever. Nothing anyone can do about that. Maybe it's just run its course.
If it does bomb, or does badly critically, I'm not going to get all upset...what're you gonna do? Either people like it or don't like it.
But I still do feel Shrek does that fairy tale spoof thing better than anyone else.
Either way, even if critics savage it or it bombs....whatever. Nothing anyone can do about that. Maybe it's just run its course.
If it does bomb, or does badly critically, I'm not going to get all upset...what're you gonna do? Either people like it or don't like it.
But I still do feel Shrek does that fairy tale spoof thing better than anyone else.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25718
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
Why not collect them all? You know you want to!ShyViolet wrote:Ahhhh, now I want a Shrek cup!! I think I really want a Puss or an Ogre Babies one.
Which reminds me, I had a dream about what droo would write. Weired, huh?ShyViolet wrote:Maybe you could post on it like you did on MTR?
Anyway he said something like, "Shrek The Third was alright, could've been much better. More-or-less like the original, (and here's the funny part) he went on to say, "ShyViolet regardless, will like it because its DW, likewise Daniel will love it, because its a sequel!"
Doesn't sound like droo, because he wouldn't jab at Vi. Me on the other hand, yeah.
Lets see what droo's "real" opinion will be!
You need to rent it, Vi!ShyViolet wrote:(Can't speak for Hoodwinked since I didn't see it--
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Which reminds me, I had a dream about what droo would write. Weired, huh?
Anyway he said something like, "Shrek The Third was alright, could've been much better. More-or-less like the original, (and here's the funny part) he went on to say, "ShyViolet regardless, will like it because its DW, likewise Daniel will love it, because its a sequel!"
Doesn't sound like droo, because he wouldn't jab at Vi. Me on the other hand, yeah. Wink
Lets see what droo's "real" opinion will be!
Ha ha...that's hysterical. Hmmm.....I wonder what his real opinion will be too!
Maybe I will! I love McD's, I have to admit. But....is it the Happy Meal or do you have to pay for it separately?Why not collect them all? You know you want to! Wink
You need to rent it, Vi! Smile
I know....there's a ton of stuff I have to rent...but as this is animation, it's higher up on the list, so hopefully soon!
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 1960
- Joined: December 16th, 2004
- Location: Burbank, Calif.
I liked it!
It's not as 'strong', storywise, as Shrek 2 .. but there are many genuinely funny moments and scenes .. and (somewhat surprisingly), much of the humor is character-based; the 'pop-culture' references and top-40 songs are still there .. but it definitely felt like there was less of those, this time around.
There did seem to be a conscious effort to give each of the characters from the previous films (and there are a lot of them, now!) a 'moment' in the spotlight. And, of course, there's a slew of new characters, now, too! The princesses were kinda fun; especially Cinderella (who has a crazy Jan Brady 'talking to herself' thing going on, in some scenes ).
Arthur was a bit of a quandry. He starts off as a somewhat 'sympathetic' character when we first meet him .. but over the course of the story he is, by turns, annoyingly 'angsty' or superficially 'hammy'; he doesn't seem to be 'king' material .. but that doesn't seem to be a problem of much real concern; he is mostly the 'macguffin' which Shrek, Donkey, and Puss go in search of.
Prince Charming as the 'heavy' this time around .. well, he's nowhere near as threatening as the cold-blooded Fairy Godmother, nor even the calculating Farquaad .. which is why he has a literal army of henchmen, I suppose. Rupert Everett does a great job with the voice, but he really isn't much more than a 'himbo' .. and his ultimate 'evil plan' seems much too easily defeated. Actually, Charming and Arthur look so much alike, that I thought it would eventually be revealed that they were related .. but that was not to be.
As I said, though, there are plenty of great, funny sequences sprinkled throughout, which ultimately are what 'make' the movie. I've never heard so much laughing during a death scene, before .. bit it is very funny! A surreal dream sequence and a certain character's 'flashback' also got huge laughs.
There's also a lot of great, expressive animation .. the characters from previous films have definitely benefitted from the rapid advances of CG animation technology. But it still takes a keen human eye for detail to bring a character to 'life' .. and PDI/Dreamworks definitely has some top-notch talent in that department. There's still a little bit of 'uncanny valley' to the human characters; but I chalk most of that up to the realistic character designs.
All in all, as I said, a 'fun' film. It should do pretty well at the box office.
ShyViolet regardless, will like it because its DW, likewise Daniel will love it, because its a sequel!
It's not as 'strong', storywise, as Shrek 2 .. but there are many genuinely funny moments and scenes .. and (somewhat surprisingly), much of the humor is character-based; the 'pop-culture' references and top-40 songs are still there .. but it definitely felt like there was less of those, this time around.
There did seem to be a conscious effort to give each of the characters from the previous films (and there are a lot of them, now!) a 'moment' in the spotlight. And, of course, there's a slew of new characters, now, too! The princesses were kinda fun; especially Cinderella (who has a crazy Jan Brady 'talking to herself' thing going on, in some scenes ).
Arthur was a bit of a quandry. He starts off as a somewhat 'sympathetic' character when we first meet him .. but over the course of the story he is, by turns, annoyingly 'angsty' or superficially 'hammy'; he doesn't seem to be 'king' material .. but that doesn't seem to be a problem of much real concern; he is mostly the 'macguffin' which Shrek, Donkey, and Puss go in search of.
Prince Charming as the 'heavy' this time around .. well, he's nowhere near as threatening as the cold-blooded Fairy Godmother, nor even the calculating Farquaad .. which is why he has a literal army of henchmen, I suppose. Rupert Everett does a great job with the voice, but he really isn't much more than a 'himbo' .. and his ultimate 'evil plan' seems much too easily defeated. Actually, Charming and Arthur look so much alike, that I thought it would eventually be revealed that they were related .. but that was not to be.
As I said, though, there are plenty of great, funny sequences sprinkled throughout, which ultimately are what 'make' the movie. I've never heard so much laughing during a death scene, before .. bit it is very funny! A surreal dream sequence and a certain character's 'flashback' also got huge laughs.
There's also a lot of great, expressive animation .. the characters from previous films have definitely benefitted from the rapid advances of CG animation technology. But it still takes a keen human eye for detail to bring a character to 'life' .. and PDI/Dreamworks definitely has some top-notch talent in that department. There's still a little bit of 'uncanny valley' to the human characters; but I chalk most of that up to the realistic character designs.
All in all, as I said, a 'fun' film. It should do pretty well at the box office.
ShyViolet regardless, will like it because its DW, likewise Daniel will love it, because its a sequel!
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 227
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: Paris
- Contact:
'Shrek The Third' ready to flop?
Film critics are predicting a flop for Shrek The Third, according to initial reviews. The last film in the series holds the record for the highest grossing animated film ever, and experts predicted that the next installment would take even more. However, initial preview reviews have left the film looking slightly disheveled, and many critics believe the movie will not do as well as initially hoped. "The rude send-up of beloved fairytale conventions remains - somewhat - but these playful jabs no longer come as a pleasuring surprise. You expect them. And you expect better," said the Hollywood Reporter.
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/a466 ... -flop.html
Film critics are predicting a flop for Shrek The Third, according to initial reviews. The last film in the series holds the record for the highest grossing animated film ever, and experts predicted that the next installment would take even more. However, initial preview reviews have left the film looking slightly disheveled, and many critics believe the movie will not do as well as initially hoped. "The rude send-up of beloved fairytale conventions remains - somewhat - but these playful jabs no longer come as a pleasuring surprise. You expect them. And you expect better," said the Hollywood Reporter.
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/a466 ... -flop.html
[url=http://www.pixar-room.com][img]http://pixarroom.free.fr/PIXAR%20PICS/mai2007/R.jpg[/img][/url]
http://www.inbedwithkinoo.canalblog.com
http://www.inbedwithkinoo.canalblog.com
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Maybe that's best. Of course I want Shrek the Third to do great, but if it doesn't do as well as planned, at least it'll be sooner better than later. Better to quit now while Shrek is still pretty popular--I think it would be worse if they did release a 4th and that flopped big time, and everyone will remember Shrek as being overexposed and not the quality film it was.
However, this is all kind of bumming me out.....
I'll get over it, though.
******************************************
But Ben, you never know, DreamWorks may surprise you.
I know you didn't have very high hopes for Over the Hedge or particularly Flushed Away, but then later you said they turned out much better than you'd expected.
However, this is all kind of bumming me out.....
I'll get over it, though.
******************************************
It just looks like too much "more of the same".
But Ben, you never know, DreamWorks may surprise you.
I know you didn't have very high hopes for Over the Hedge or particularly Flushed Away, but then later you said they turned out much better than you'd expected.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!