Peter Jackson's King Kong
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9094
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Even though I really enjoyed the movie (including the ice-skating scene) in some ways I agree that Kong could have been a little scarier. Early on they establish that he's not really "bad", just misunderstood. I think they could have milked the fear a little longer.
Anyways, I still thought it was great! The film felt just right to me, not too long or too short in the slightest. It flew by, really. The early scenes on the boat definetly established the mood VERY WELL (something that's defintelely missing in modern horror films--remember Jaws?) The characterizations were wonderful, the setting Romantic, exotic, amazing. (especially those tribespeople!) They could have perhaps used a few more "scares" in the Spielberg vein (the kind that really make you scream) but it was still awesome.
Bravo, Mr. Jackson!
Anyways, I still thought it was great! The film felt just right to me, not too long or too short in the slightest. It flew by, really. The early scenes on the boat definetly established the mood VERY WELL (something that's defintelely missing in modern horror films--remember Jaws?) The characterizations were wonderful, the setting Romantic, exotic, amazing. (especially those tribespeople!) They could have perhaps used a few more "scares" in the Spielberg vein (the kind that really make you scream) but it was still awesome.
Bravo, Mr. Jackson!
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Team
- Posts: 6709
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
They should have cut an hour. Starting with the ice skating and the bug punching scenes!
You are entitled to your own opinion and I'm not trying to argue with it. But when a movie is three hours long, or even two, it can't just be nothing but a big ape killing stuff non-stop. I've seen this movie twice, and the odd thing is, it felt a lot shorter the second time through. I suppose the first time I just couldn't wait to get to the action.
But my point is, number one, Peter Jackson NEVER would've cut the spider-pit sequence. It is similar to a scene that was cut from the original "Kong". And what's wrong with the skating part? It gave Kong and Ann one more quiet moment together before he died.
Action movies can't be ALL action, you know?
You are entitled to your own opinion and I'm not trying to argue with it. But when a movie is three hours long, or even two, it can't just be nothing but a big ape killing stuff non-stop. I've seen this movie twice, and the odd thing is, it felt a lot shorter the second time through. I suppose the first time I just couldn't wait to get to the action.
But my point is, number one, Peter Jackson NEVER would've cut the spider-pit sequence. It is similar to a scene that was cut from the original "Kong". And what's wrong with the skating part? It gave Kong and Ann one more quiet moment together before he died.
Action movies can't be ALL action, you know?
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25715
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
K...saw Kong again on Saturday for the second time, and...
Apart from the sound being much better and LOUDER in this theater, I really felt the film dragged in the middle. Uh oh!!
Normally, when I see a film for the second time, be it one I loved or hated, they usually fly past even faster than before, but this did feel too long this time around.
Also, the encounter with the running dinos looked very fake without the excitement of seeing it all for the first time. Bad, in fact, giving away that the actors were not even running, but merely jogging on a treadmill in a green screen stage. Pretty poor.
But I still loved everything else - yes, even the ice skate part which really puts the lid on Ann and Kong's relationship and provides the calm before the final storm.
Plot holes started to really rear their ugly head though...I seemingly had to skip over more than I did before, and I wasn't sure that Jackson was as good of a director here as he was on Heavenly Creatures and Lord Of The Rings. I have to say that there were some strange choices that jumped out at me this second time around.
Anyone else seen it again, and how was it for you?
Apart from the sound being much better and LOUDER in this theater, I really felt the film dragged in the middle. Uh oh!!
Normally, when I see a film for the second time, be it one I loved or hated, they usually fly past even faster than before, but this did feel too long this time around.
Also, the encounter with the running dinos looked very fake without the excitement of seeing it all for the first time. Bad, in fact, giving away that the actors were not even running, but merely jogging on a treadmill in a green screen stage. Pretty poor.
But I still loved everything else - yes, even the ice skate part which really puts the lid on Ann and Kong's relationship and provides the calm before the final storm.
Plot holes started to really rear their ugly head though...I seemingly had to skip over more than I did before, and I wasn't sure that Jackson was as good of a director here as he was on Heavenly Creatures and Lord Of The Rings. I have to say that there were some strange choices that jumped out at me this second time around.
Anyone else seen it again, and how was it for you?
- AV Team
- Posts: 6709
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
- AV Team
- Posts: 6709
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A