Alvin and the Chipmunks (Fox)

Features, Shorts, Live-Action and Direct-To-Video
Post Reply
AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 42
Joined: October 12th, 2007

Post by CharlieBarkin » December 16th, 2007, 3:39 pm

Give it time, and watch next weekends proceeds absolutely plummet off the face of the earth.
"The difference between insanity and genius, is measured only by success"

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » December 16th, 2007, 8:38 pm

I doubt that. Even if the movie has its shortcomings, it'll still be in the top 5.

From what I've been hearing, (on/offline) a lot of people liked it! Yes, I'm a little shocked, too. Reviews such as; 'not as bad as I was expecting', 'better than Garfield and Fat Albert' although, I've also heard negative remarks, such as some of the music was horrible and Dave sounds like he's shouting all the time. Ah well...

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 493
Joined: November 11th, 2007
Location: NY

Post by Foxtale » December 16th, 2007, 10:16 pm

I repeat my comment once again...... Has anyone on the forums seen it yet? For me I think I'm going to wait until it comes to the dollar theater to watch it.
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v188/Foxtale/almostthere_signature_smaller.jpg[/img]

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 1347
Joined: January 23rd, 2006
Location: The Middle of Nowhere

Post by eddievalient » December 18th, 2007, 12:10 pm

It only needs one more strong week to make its budget back, then everything after that (from foreign box office or whatever) will be pure profit. I must say I'm surprised. I thought it would at least break even but I was expecting more of a struggle. I'm going to try and take my neice to see it at some point, so if I do, then I'll post my thoughts on it. Anyone else think we'll get a new animated series out of this (for better or worse)?
The Official Lugofilm Ltd Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/bartsimpson83

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25715
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » December 18th, 2007, 12:30 pm

A film typically needs to bring back in at least TWICE it's budget to start earning a profit.

Remember that the Studios only recoup HALF of the box office receipts (shared with the theater chains), and then spend almost half the budget again to advertise and market the product domestically.

Factor in those same costs for international distribution and a film needs to make back much more than its budget to start turning some green. That's why pay-TV packages and DVD are such an important revenue stream.

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » December 24th, 2007, 3:15 am

Week #2 and the Chipmunks bring in another $29 million. Not bad...

AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6708
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey » December 24th, 2007, 2:22 pm

I saw it the other day.

I will say this much about the movie: It could've been a LOT worse than it was.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25715
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » December 25th, 2007, 5:42 am

:shock: ;)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » December 27th, 2007, 10:24 pm

How could you, WJ!? ;)

But that's good to hear, I guess...

AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6708
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey » December 29th, 2007, 12:43 pm

Well, it's at least wasn't as bad as the teaser trailer made me think it would be. ;)
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 9094
Joined: October 25th, 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post by ShyViolet » January 24th, 2008, 9:00 pm

Funny Alvin review! :) (kinda entertaining)
Alvin and the Chipmunks

December 14, 2007



By Roger Ebert

The most astonishing sight in "Alvin and the Chipmunks" is not three singing chipmunks. No, it's a surprise saved for the closing titles, where we see the covers of all the Alvin & company albums and CDs. I lost track after 10. It is inconceivable to me that anyone would want to listen to one whole album of those squeaky little voices, let alone 10. "The Chipmunk Song," maybe, for its fleeting novelty. But "Only You"?

There are, however, Alvin and the Chipmunks fans. Their latest album rates 4.5/5 at the iTunes store, where I sampled their version of "Only You" and the original by the Platters, and immediately downloaded "The Platters Greatest Hits." I imagine people even impatiently pre-order the Chipmunks, however, which speaks highly for the drawing power of electronically altered voices by interchangeable singers. This film is dedicated to Ross Bagdasarian Sr., "who was crazy enough" to dream them up. I think the wording is about right.

Despite the fact that the film is set in the present, when the real (or "real") Chipmunks already have a back catalog bigger than Kimya Dawson's, the movie tells the story of how they become rock stars and almost get burned out on the rock circuit. Jason Lee stars as Dave Seville, who accidentally brings them home in a basket of muffins, discovers they can talk and is soon shouting "Alvin!" at the top of his lungs, as Chipmunk lore requires that he must.

David Cross plays Ian, the hustling tour promoter who signs them up and takes them on the road, where they burn out and he suggests they start syncing with dubbed voices. Now we're getting into Alice in Wonderland territory, because of course they are dubbed voices in the first place. Indeed the metaphysics of dubbing dubbed chipmunks who exist in the real world as animated representations of real chipmunks is ... how did this sentence begin?

That said, whatever it was, "Alvin and the Chipmunks" is about as good as a movie with these characters can probably be, and I am well aware that I am the wrong audience for this movie. I am even sure some readers will throw it up to me like I liked the "Garfield" movie better. Yes, but Garfield didn't sing, and he was dubbed by Bill Murray. My duty as a reporter is to inform you that the chipmunks are sorta cute, that Jason Lee and David Cross manfully play roles that require them, as actors, to relate with empty space that would later be filled with CGI, and that at some level, the movie may even be doing something satirical about rock stars and the hype machine.

I was also grateful that Alvin wears a red sweater with a big "A" on it as an aid to identification, since otherwise all the chipmunks seem to be identical, like Mutant Turtles or Spice Girls. It doesn't much matter which one is Theodore and which one is Simon, although Theodore is always the one who seems a day late and a walnut short.

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... /0/search3
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 124
Joined: November 26th, 2007

Post by Otis8 » April 2nd, 2008, 6:27 pm

Just curious any store exclusives? I kinda liked it and the stuff might make it more tempting. :)

AV Forum Member
AV Forum Member
Posts: 10081
Joined: September 1st, 2006

Post by Daniel » April 2nd, 2008, 6:52 pm

Oh, of course! Circuit City has a singing pen, Best Buy has the trio in a plush set and Wal-Mart has a sampler CD.

Personally, I would go with Best Buy... although, the gift-set seems to be selling out rather quickly. (not available near me.) Wal-Mart would be my second choice. Hope that helps.

AV Team
AV Team
Posts: 6708
Joined: February 8th, 2005
Location: The US of A

Post by Dacey » April 3rd, 2008, 11:39 am

We got the film yesterday. My mom wanted to have it.
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."

User avatar
AV Founder
AV Founder
Posts: 25715
Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Location: London, UK

Post by Ben » April 3rd, 2008, 5:02 pm

Wow, this is out already? Passed me by! :)

Post Reply