Bolt
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: November 3rd, 2006
- Location: Bournemouth, UK
American Dog looks cool and hopefully if its anything like lilo and stitch it will a great film! I'm also really excited about Rapunzel. Saw a lot of test stuff/art/final shots for Meet the Robinsons at a Disney conference and it actually really impressed me, not sure if it will be as successful as the pixar films though.
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: November 26th, 2005
- Location: Birmingham, England
- Contact:
Well it will come as no surprise that I'm painfully excited about MTR. The animation is to die for and the whole thing feels so wildly different from anything that's gone before.
Hugely excited about Frog Princess. A fairytale MUSICAL in traditional animation by Musker and Clements, my favourite directors in animation and the creators of my two fave Disney films, Hercules and Aladdin.
But overall I'd say I'm most excited about Rapunzel. Why? For two reasons: Firstly, the animation is supposed to be revolutionary, never been seen type of stuff. Secondly, considering no genre seems to have been touched upon in cg other than comedy, I believe that Rapunzel will pave the way for a wide range of quality cg films and re-establish Disney as the leader of animation in the process.
Hugely excited about Frog Princess. A fairytale MUSICAL in traditional animation by Musker and Clements, my favourite directors in animation and the creators of my two fave Disney films, Hercules and Aladdin.
But overall I'd say I'm most excited about Rapunzel. Why? For two reasons: Firstly, the animation is supposed to be revolutionary, never been seen type of stuff. Secondly, considering no genre seems to have been touched upon in cg other than comedy, I believe that Rapunzel will pave the way for a wide range of quality cg films and re-establish Disney as the leader of animation in the process.
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: November 26th, 2005
- Location: Birmingham, England
- Contact:
I'm not hugely excited about American Dog but I loved Lilo and Stitch and Mulan so I'm expecting Sanders to pull off another great film. Really hope it isn't Hollywood Dog though. I wasn't raving about American Dog to be honest, far too modern and pop culturish, but Hollywood Dog just sounds like a working title type thing. Then again, I hated the name Wii for ages and that's grown on me so who knows?
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 10081
- Joined: September 1st, 2006
2008 doesn't seem logical to me. It was intended for 2007, but now that Chris walked away from the project, because of the lack of CG, who knows how long it will be.
Usually, it takes 4 years to make a film, so I'm curious, do you guys think its already all drawn up with storyboards and whatnot? If so, than yeah, I do see 2008 being the year of the dog.
Shame, I kind of lost all interest in this film. Chris is brilliant, and has brought so much to Disney, even what could've been the next biggest franshise. (Lilo and Stich) Now to be out of the picture, from his own creation, just seems wrong.
I'm all for 2d making a comeback, but if Chris wanted to go CG, than why not let him? They allowed the guy to use a particular way of animating that hasn't been done since Dumbo on L&S, and looked what happened?
I don't know, maybe I'm thinking to much into this, but I believe he might have tried new techniques that haven't been done in CG world yet.
We'll see soon enough, if Disney made the right choice.
Usually, it takes 4 years to make a film, so I'm curious, do you guys think its already all drawn up with storyboards and whatnot? If so, than yeah, I do see 2008 being the year of the dog.
Shame, I kind of lost all interest in this film. Chris is brilliant, and has brought so much to Disney, even what could've been the next biggest franshise. (Lilo and Stich) Now to be out of the picture, from his own creation, just seems wrong.
I'm all for 2d making a comeback, but if Chris wanted to go CG, than why not let him? They allowed the guy to use a particular way of animating that hasn't been done since Dumbo on L&S, and looked what happened?
I don't know, maybe I'm thinking to much into this, but I believe he might have tried new techniques that haven't been done in CG world yet.
We'll see soon enough, if Disney made the right choice.
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25714
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
I read on Wik that almost all of Pixar's artists come form Cal Arts. Is this true? If so, I think it's kind of narrow-minded of them, as there are MANY great artists out there who come from all different art schools and colleges. (and all over the world.)
(Although I'm pretty sure Chris Sanders went to Cal Arts.... )
.
(Although I'm pretty sure Chris Sanders went to Cal Arts.... )
.
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 3845
- Joined: May 31st, 2005
- Location: Maryland
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: October 25th, 2004
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Well, maybe you're right. After all Wik's not what you'd call an "authority" on many things....
Still, 39 languages are spoken at DWA. Can Pixar say the same? I'm just asking. I also read on AN that while Pixar only recruits about 2 or 3 new animators a year, DW goes for at least a dozen. All I'm trying to say is...Pixar seems like a very "closed" and cloistered world. I think many of their artists have been there since the begining so maybe that's why they don't hire that many new guys/girls. They are very used to doing things a certain way so maybe that's why they're so finicky about these projects.
And also for some reason it seems that they're doing away with the personal service contracts started during the Eisner/Katzenberg regime. (There's no contracts at Pixar either.) I don't know enough about this business to know if that's a good or bad thing.
Still, 39 languages are spoken at DWA. Can Pixar say the same? I'm just asking. I also read on AN that while Pixar only recruits about 2 or 3 new animators a year, DW goes for at least a dozen. All I'm trying to say is...Pixar seems like a very "closed" and cloistered world. I think many of their artists have been there since the begining so maybe that's why they don't hire that many new guys/girls. They are very used to doing things a certain way so maybe that's why they're so finicky about these projects.
And also for some reason it seems that they're doing away with the personal service contracts started during the Eisner/Katzenberg regime. (There's no contracts at Pixar either.) I don't know enough about this business to know if that's a good or bad thing.
Yeah, I don't blame you. But there's also lots of regular universities that offer animation/computer graphics/art programs (Cornell for one! ) Or Brown or BU. Or if you want to be right in the zone, there's USC and UCLA!(BTW, I reaaaallly want to go to CalArts for college! )
You can’t just have your characters announce how they feel! That makes me feel angry!
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 29
- Joined: December 28th, 2006
- Location: Bogart, Georgia
American Dog for 2008
Honestly, I don't think John Lasseter should run disney feature animation.
Not that I don't like him or anything, but I think he only knows how to run pixar. Why didn't they just appoint one of disney's animators like Glen Keane or Will Finn, or maybe film producer Don Hahn to run WDFA.
Not that I don't like him or anything, but I think he only knows how to run pixar. Why didn't they just appoint one of disney's animators like Glen Keane or Will Finn, or maybe film producer Don Hahn to run WDFA.