Night at the Museum
- AV Team
- Posts: 6755
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Night at the Museum
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 248
- Joined: August 23rd, 2005
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Contact:
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25867
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
Awwe nuts.
The first movie was real, unexpected magic. The best Disney fantasy in ages that Disney never made!
Have to say that the idea behind this has me intrigued in a cheesy way, but really NATM was a perfect single movie.
There's no need for a sequel, especially a summer sequel, which won't feel as magical as the Christmas one last year.
Ho-hum...Hollywood + Money = No Sense or Morals.
The first movie was real, unexpected magic. The best Disney fantasy in ages that Disney never made!
Have to say that the idea behind this has me intrigued in a cheesy way, but really NATM was a perfect single movie.
There's no need for a sequel, especially a summer sequel, which won't feel as magical as the Christmas one last year.
Ho-hum...Hollywood + Money = No Sense or Morals.

-
- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 5207
- Joined: September 27th, 2007
Well, Disney had to cancel their script for "Unnatural History" (in which a family gets trapped overnight) around the time NATM was greenlit, if that's what you mean--Ben wrote:The first movie was real, unexpected magic. The best Disney fantasy in ages that Disney never made!
And given how little of Fox's movie actually resembles the children's-book whose title and concept they quickly borrowed, looks like that's not the only movie with an unnatural history...

Have to say that the idea behind this has me intrigued in a cheesy way, but really NATM was a perfect single movie.
Even though Ben Stiller came off as a major jerk for most of the middle third of the movie, and I still don't think we're ready for a
Putting Stiller in the same movie with Dick Van Dyke and expecting us to sympathize with him is roughly equivalent to...I dunno...putting Stiller in a movie next to Robin Williams?

There's no need for a sequel, especially a summer sequel, which won't feel as magical as the Christmas one last year.
NATM only made its pile as a Christmas-vacation film for last year (and in fact, the Christmas-vacation family film, as "Charlotte's Web" found out)--
It wasn't 100% because of the movie.
- AV Founder
- Posts: 25867
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
- Location: London, UK
I hate to disagree with you on all three points, but...
Nope, I meant it was the best Disney film that Disney never made. A pure and simple a statement as I could imagine.
Stiller, who I have completely gone off after early success, was the warmest, most rounded character he's been for about ten years. And Dick Van Dyke as a villain? What a <I>great</I> twist! Like "Dick Tracy" never happened, then, you mean?
If NATM hadn't been such good, honest to goodness family fun that we haven't had in ages (see the Disney comment again), why did people keep flocking? It was straight escapism, pure and simple, with some terrific production values and a neat concept (wherever it came from).
Enough with the citric-acid comments, man, there's enough negativity in the world.
Nope, I meant it was the best Disney film that Disney never made. A pure and simple a statement as I could imagine.
Stiller, who I have completely gone off after early success, was the warmest, most rounded character he's been for about ten years. And Dick Van Dyke as a villain? What a <I>great</I> twist! Like "Dick Tracy" never happened, then, you mean?
If NATM hadn't been such good, honest to goodness family fun that we haven't had in ages (see the Disney comment again), why did people keep flocking? It was straight escapism, pure and simple, with some terrific production values and a neat concept (wherever it came from).
Enough with the citric-acid comments, man, there's enough negativity in the world.
- AV Team
- Posts: 6755
- Joined: February 8th, 2005
- Location: The US of A
Comingsoon.net reports that Amy Adams is now in it and has an early plot summary:
http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=36865The film kicks off when the artifacts from the Museum of Natural History are boxed up and sent to the archives at the Smithsonian in Washington. Adams will play an undetermined historical figure who has a crush on security guard Larry (Stiller).
"Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift--that is why it's called the present."
- AV Team
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: October 22nd, 2004
Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
The teaser trailer for Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian is now at HappyMeal.com. 

- AV Forum Member
- Posts: 416
- Joined: August 11th, 2008