
This is something that's been bugging me for a while.
Perhaps it's just my own personal biases, but I consider Disney animation to be technically superior to Japanese animation, for the most part. There are a few exceptions, like Akira, which I think has the highest number of frames per second in any animated film - is that right?
Anyway, the point of my question is why is it that Western animators do not create more 'adult'-ish animation, along the lines of Ralph Bakshi's stuff? Bluth's Titan A.E., I would also consider, a far more mature offering than Disney's flicks. Even 'Anastasia' had a distinctive Don Bluth edge about it, I felt (though that could just be because of the rotoscoping).
Don't get me wrong - I'm a big Disney fan, but this is something that's been puzzling me.
I mean, why DON'T these films do well? People complain that Western animation is geared for kids, and yet we get these amazing films which critics quash.
I understand that studios may not be willing to make the monetary commitment to produce a 'serious' animated film because of the previous lack of success of such films when made in the West, but seriously, is that really the only hurdle? I just find it hard to accept that there's so much stigma about this when there are so many people outside Japan who watch 'serious' Japanese animation (and in fact, my friends say that they prefer Japanese animation to American solely on the basis that it's "more mature" as opposed to the actual technical excellence of the animation). Clearly, there must be a large and untapped market in the West for 'serious' Western-made animated films.