http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/04/23/ ... characters

Well, that's the problem--Once you're past Wonder Woman, Batgirl and Supergirl, there aren't that many well-known female characters in DC (Black Canary? Zatanna?) to demographically market.droosan wrote:As an aside: it's kinda sad to see what's become of Harley Quinn, in recent comics & media. Her original incarnation in Batman: TAS was iconic .. but no-one else at DC/Warner seems to want to let her just be that character.
.. which I take to mean that this is more akin to something like Monster High -- where, rather than being designated as 'heroines' and 'villaines' (?), the characters will be grouped in cliques of 'good girls' and 'baa-ad grrls'.IGN wrote:The toy line was developed for girls ages 6-12 and focused on female superheroes and supervillains during their "formative years, prior to discovering their full super power potential," according to Mattel.
They had to get a demographically racial mix, and Bumblebee was at least black (although keeping it to heroines, wouldn't have been bad to have a teen Vixen, with her animal motifs, but that's getting into seriously obscure DC). Which explains why Katana is also on the group as token Asian, despite also being on the Suicide Squad.Randall wrote:And I do find it odd that the girl villains get lumped in with the girl heroes. DC does have a number of female heroes, after all. Black Canary even shares a show now with Green Arrow, surely that gives her some cred?! Pulling Bumblebee out (she is a heroine, by the way, from the Teen Titans) at least gives some color to the group, but she's hardly A-list as a character.