I do like it, but I hate what Ben pointed out. It just wasn't neeed.

(but you guys should be checking Animated Views too!!):
If they would add matchgirl, they should add "one by one" as wellBTW, in that Fantasia 2000 continued or whatever it's going to be, how would you guys feel about adding Matchgirl to it?
Coupled with that amazing Eric Goldberg (ahhhh.....another WDFA master) Rhapsody in Blue piece, it would be pure awesomeness.
I did like it, but not for the animation. Very simplistic. And yet the story was quirky and funny and full of culture (as well as being original), so I don't think it didn't deserve to win. Though I am a little disappointed too that Matchgirl didn't win because it was absolutely beautiful. But I'm sure the Academy loved the artsiness of The Danish Poet, so that's why it got the nod. If it were based on animation quality alone though... I'd think Matchgirl was robbed, too.ShyViolet wrote:About the Oscars....I WISH so bad we'd seen Roger Allers up on that stage....his film was a masterwork....I totally don't think the other one, can't remember the name, deserved to win at all...it looked like warmed-over Madeline/Babar, like it belonged on Nick Jr. or something.....(no offense to those who liked it, maybe it was good for all I know....)
Grr, don't remind me!Ben wrote:Destino, Matchgirl, One By One and Lorenzo were ALL intended to make up a third Fantasia. When the project fell through, it made more sense to complete the active sequences as stand-alone short films.
Very, very interesting interview Josh!Speaking of The Little Matchgirl...
Animated News & Views presents Director Roger Allers on The Little Matchgirl
Wow, that's so cool, how it all came together.Ben wrote:ShyViolet wrote:Hopefully in the future we'll see all these shorts on a Fantasia Continued DVD.Ben wrote:There's something in the works that collects Disney's recent shorts.Put two and two together.Daniel wrote:And its?